Table 4.
Source | Coefficient | Standard error | Sum of squares | df | Mean square | F-value | Prob > F |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Factorial model | 87.76 | 6 | 14.63 | 5.31 | 0.0435* | ||
A: Glucose | 1.63 | 0.48 | 31.76 | 1 | 31.76 | 11.54 | 0.0193*a |
B: Rice husk | 0.36 | 0.48 | 1.59 | 1 | 1.59 | 0.58 | 0.4817a |
C: Yeast extract | −0.63 | 0.48 | 4.72 | 1 | 4.72 | 1.72 | 0.2471b |
D: Tween 80 | −1.42 | 0.48 | 24.06 | 1 | 24.06 | 8.74 | 0.0316*b |
E: CaCl2 | 0.71 | 0.48 | 6.05 | 1 | 6.05 | 2.20 | 0.1984a |
F: pH | −1.28 | 0.48 | 19.57 | 1 | 19.57 | 7.11 | 0.0445*b |
Residual | 13.76 | 5 | 2.75 | ||||
Cor. Total | 101.52 | 11 |
Plackett-Burman. Estimated coefficient, standard error and corresponding F and P values for biomass production (Log10 CFU ml−1) of Pleurotus spp. (T1.1) for six experimented variables
R2 = 0.8644, Adj. R2 = 0.7018, Adeq. Precision = 6.694
*Significant at 95 %
aPositive effect
bNegative effect