Skip to main content
. 2012 Oct 8;8(1):29–35. doi: 10.5114/wiitm.2011.30943

Table II.

Comparison of our data with other series of retroperitoneoscopic necrosectomies

Study N Delay to necrosec-tomy, days (median) Pre-op infected necrosis Technique Procedures per patient, n Laparotomy required, n Postoperative stay [days] Mortality
Gambiez et al. 1998 [17] 20 18 13 Lumbotomy and medianoscopy 5 ±4 (mean) 2 62 2
Chang et al. 2006 [14] 19 35 13 Left flank incision and blunt dissection N/A 1 23.2 3
Besselink et al. 2006 [3] 18 48 7 Left-sided lumbotomy and VARD 2 (1-11) N/A 100 2
Mui et al. 2005 [18] 9 N/A 9 Seldinger and nephroscopy 3 (2-8) 2 84 1
Connor et al. 2005 [19] 47 28 38 N/A 3 (1-9) 12 64 9
Castellanos et al.2005 [11] 11 13 11 Left translumbar and flexible nephroscopy 5 (3-10) 0 98 3
Risse et al. 2004 [20] 6 48 6 Seldinger and nephroscopy 2 (1-4) 0 26 0
Carter et al. 2004 [21] 10 24 10 Nephrostomy, nephroscopy and sinus tract endoscopy 3 (1-6) 1 42 2
Our data 13 26 13 Retroperitoneal necrosectomy 3 (1-9) 2 51 0