Table 3.
Total Sample |
Male |
Female |
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Variable | Obsa | Mean | SD | Min | Max | Mean | SD | Mean | SD |
Dependent Variable: CES-D | |||||||||
Wave 1 in home | 796 | 4.19 | (2.82) | 1 | 10 | 4.04 | (2.67) | 4.36 | (2.96) |
Wave 2 in home | 627 | 4.17 | (2.83) | 1 | 10 | 3.88 | (2.71) | 4.45 | (2.92) |
Prop. decreased | 625 | 0.37 | 0 | 1 | 0.37 | 0.36 | |||
Prop. stayed the same | 625 | 0.27 | 0 | 1 | 0.26 | 0.27 | |||
Prop. increased | 625 | 0.37 | 0 | 1 | 0.37 | 0.36 | |||
Network Characteristics | |||||||||
Off list nomination count | 798 | 2.39 | (2.20) | 0 | 10 | 1.12 | (1.36) | 1.19 | (1.21) |
Restricted nom. sample | 798 | 0.40 | 0 | 1 | 0.41 | 0.39 | |||
Alter CES-D (exclusion) | 798 | −0.61 | (5.18) | −25.0 | 20.4 | −0.53 | (3.61) | 0.18 | (4.12) |
Ego CES-D (withdrawal) | 796 | −0.50 | (10.90) | −27.2 | 40.2 | −0.19 | (5.88) | −0.07 | (6.91) |
Average friend similarity (homophily) | 688 | 0.66 | (0.19) | 0 | 1 | 0.68 | (0.22) | 0.63 | (0.22) |
Received nominations | 798 | 3.28 | (2.93) | 0 | 19 | 1.89 | (1.72) | 1.92 | (1.73) |
Out nominations | 779 | 3.36 | (2.27) | 0 | 10 | 1.94 | (1.41) | 1.99 | (1.37) |
Reciprocal ties count | 779 | 1.20 | (1.31) | 0 | 7 | 0.85 | (0.99) | 0.93 | (1.06) |
Transitive triplets count | 779 | 3.37 | (4.83) | 0 | 29 | 1.16 | (1.70) | 1.36 | (2.22) |
Covariates | |||||||||
Female | 798 | 0.50 | 0 | 1 | |||||
Grade | 795 | 9.47 | (1.69) | 7 | 12 | 9.47 | (1.72) | 9.47 | (1.66) |
White | 798 | 0.97 | 0 | 1 | 0.98 | 0.96 | |||
Parent education | 717 | 2.63 | (1.04) | 1 | 5 | 2.61 | (1.03) | 2.66 | (1.04) |
Single parent | 721 | 0.22 | 0 | 1 | 0.22 | 0.22 | |||
Parent support | 610 | 0.27 | (0.93) | −4.12 | 1.31 | 0.31 | (0.82) | 0.24 | (1.03) |
Self-esteem | 798 | 0.14 | (0.94) | −3.52 | 1.56 | 0.29 | (0.85) | −0.01 | (1.00) |
Notes: Observations for CES-D change between waves 1 and 2 largely because of high school graduation.