Skip to main content
. 2013 Apr 11;68(3):420–430. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbt022

Table 2.

Multilevel Regression Results for Intergenerational Ambivalence Among Chinese Rural Elderly Population (N = 4,396)

Model 1 Model 2 Model 3 Model 4
b SE b SE b SE b SE
Fixed effects
 Intercept −1.09*** 0.051 −4.27** 1.39 −4.38* 1.64 −4.29** 1.53
Children’s attributes
  Age 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
  Sons 0.67*** 0.05 0.67*** 0.05 0.73*** 0.05
  Married 0.03 0.05 0.03 0.05 0.03 0.05
  Educationa
   Primary school −0.08 0.06 −0.08 0.06 −0.09 0.06
   Junior high school −0.06 0.07 −0.06 0.07 −0.09 0.07
   Senior high school −0.14 0.11 −0.12 0.11 −0.09 0.11
 Occupationb
   Professionals/entrepreneurs −0.31** 0.10 −0.30** 0.10 −0.28** 0.10
   Workers/services −0.09 0.06 −0.09 0.06 −0.11* 0.06
   Others 0.10 0.11 0.10 0.11 0.07 0.11
  Had economic difficulties 0.11 0.06 0.12 0.06 0.12 0.06
  Urban hukou status −0.46*** 0.09 −0.46*** 0.09 −0.71*** 0.11
  Geographic distance from the parent −0.04* 0.02 −0.04* 0.02 −0.04* 0.02
  Frequency of contact with the parent 0.04* 0.02 0.04* 0.02 0.04* 0.02
Support from parents to children
  Net monetary transfer 0.35** 0.14 0.35** 0.14 0.35** 0.14
  Help with childcare 0.23*** 0.06 0.23*** 0.06 0.22*** 0.06
Parent’s attributes
  Age 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.01
  Mothers −0.15 0.12 −0.15 0.12
  Married 0.10 0.13 0.10 0.13
  Educated −0.09 0.12 −0.09 0.12
  Income (Ln + 1) −0.01 0.02 −0.01 0.02
  Functional health difficulties 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.02
 Interactions
  Son × urban hukou status −0.49*** 0.14
Random effects
 Intercept 2.53 0.13 2.48 0.12 2.49 0.12 2.49 0.12
 Residual 1.53 0.04 1.42 0.04 1.42 0.04 1.42 0.04

Notes. aReference category is illiterate.

bReference category is farmers.

* p < .05. **p < .01. ***p < .001 (two tailed).