Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Anxiety Disord. 2013 Jan 5;27(2):171–177. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2012.12.004

Table 3.

Summary of Hierarchical Regressions Predicting Child Anxiety from Each Variable of Interest

Mother
Control
Father
Control
Mother
Acceptance
Father
Acceptance
Anxious
Interpretation
Parent
Modeling
Variables β (SEβ) ΔR2 β (SEβ) ΔR2 β (SEβ) ΔR2 β (SEβ) ΔR2 β (SEβ) ΔR2 β (SEβ) ΔR2
Step 1 .05 .06 .06 .05 .05 .16
     Child Gender .18 (.15) .20 (.16) .18 (.15) .20 (.15) .20 (.15) .39* (.19)
     Income −.15 (.15) −.13 (.16) −.15 (.15) −.13 (.15) −.11 (.15) −.15 (.19)
     Mother Anxiety -- -- -- -- -- −.06 (.19)

Step 2 .17** .16** .03 .03 .10* .11
     Variable of Interest .41** (.14) .41** (.15) .18 (.15) .18 (.16) .32* (.15) .34 (.15)

Total Statistics R2 = .22, F(3, 43)
= 4.07, p = .012
R2 = .22, F(3, 38)
= 3.51, p = .024
R2 = .09, F(3, 42)
= 1.29, p = ns
R2 = .09, F(3, 39)
= 1.24, p = ns
R2 = .15, F(3, 41)
= 2.47, p = .076
R2 = .27, F(4, 23)
= 2.17, p = ns

Note. Controlling for the presence of a father in the family discussion task yielded the same result as the analysis above in which Parent Modeling predicts child anxiety.

*

p < .05,

**

p < .01,

p = .074