Table 3.
Mother Control |
Father Control |
Mother Acceptance |
Father Acceptance |
Anxious Interpretation |
Parent Modeling |
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Variables | β (SEβ) | ΔR2 | β (SEβ) | ΔR2 | β (SEβ) | ΔR2 | β (SEβ) | ΔR2 | β (SEβ) | ΔR2 | β (SEβ) | ΔR2 |
Step 1 | .05 | .06 | .06 | .05 | .05 | .16 | ||||||
Child Gender | .18 (.15) | .20 (.16) | .18 (.15) | .20 (.15) | .20 (.15) | .39* (.19) | ||||||
Income | −.15 (.15) | −.13 (.16) | −.15 (.15) | −.13 (.15) | −.11 (.15) | −.15 (.19) | ||||||
Mother Anxiety | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | −.06 (.19) | ||||||
Step 2 | .17** | .16** | .03 | .03 | .10* | .11† | ||||||
Variable of Interest | .41** (.14) | .41** (.15) | .18 (.15) | .18 (.16) | .32* (.15) | .34† (.15) | ||||||
Total Statistics | R2 = .22, F(3, 43) = 4.07, p = .012 |
R2 = .22, F(3, 38) = 3.51, p = .024 |
R2 = .09, F(3, 42) = 1.29, p = ns |
R2 = .09, F(3, 39) = 1.24, p = ns |
R2 = .15, F(3, 41) = 2.47, p = .076 |
R2 = .27, F(4, 23) = 2.17, p = ns |
Note. Controlling for the presence of a father in the family discussion task yielded the same result as the analysis above in which Parent Modeling predicts child anxiety.
p < .05,
p < .01,
p = .074