Skip to main content
. 2012 Jan 30;39(3):564–574. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbr189

Table 4.

Neurocognitive Scores Stratified by Dopamine D2 Occupancy

D2 Occupancy Level D2 Occupancy Range (%) z Score (Mean ± SD)
Verbal Memory Vigilance Processing Speed Reasoning Working Memory Summary Score
Low (n = 102) 15.5–62.7 0.084 ± 1.077 0.174 ± 0.964 0.159 ± 0.958 0.311 ± 0.866a 0.293 ± 0.787 0.275 ± 0.920
Slightly low (n = 102) 62.7–71.8 0.188 ± 1.015 0.306 ± 0.992b 0.223 ± 0.889 0.259 ± 0.899 0.229 ± 0.880 0.323 ± 0.937
Slightly high (n = 103) 71.9–77.2 0.180 ± 0.865 0.385 ± 0.951c 0.167 ± 0.913 0.285 ± 0.853 0.309 ± 0.736 0.354 ± 0.839d
High (n = 103) 77.2–85.8 0.025 ± 0.990 −0.110 ± 0.934 −0.085 ± 0.903 −0.013 ± 0.949 0.095 ± 1.017 −0.008 ± 0.951

Note: Significant differences were found in vigilance score, reasoning score, and summary score (F 3, 406 = 5.21, P = .002; F 3, 406 = 2.90, P = .04; F 3, 406 = 3.36, P = .02, respectively) by the one-way ANOVA.

a

P =.049 by the Turkey-Kramer HSD (honestly significant difference), vs high D2 group.

b

P = .012 by the Turkey-Kramer HSD, vs high D2 group.

c

P = .002 by the Turkey-Kramer HSD, vs high D2 group.

d

P = .025 by the Turkey-Kramer HSD, vs high D2 group.