Table II.
ANOVA showing a statistically significant difference in NMF among the 3 FLG genotype subgroups together with 95% CIs
| Genotype | No. | Mean NMF | 95% CI | Comparison genotype | Mean difference | 95% CI mean difference | P value∗ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLG+/+ | 53 | 1.31 ± 0.24 | 1.24 to 1.37 | FLG+/− | 0.51 | 0.40 to 0.60 | <.001 |
| FLG−/− | 0.74 | 0.62 to 0.87 | <.001 | ||||
| FLG+/− | 55 | 0.80 ± 0.21 | 0.74 to 0.86 | FLG+/+ | −0.51 | −0.60- to −0.41 | <.001 |
| FLG−/− | 0.24 | 0.11 to 0.36 | <.001 | ||||
| FLG−/− | 24 | 0.57 ± 0.15 | 0.50 to 0.63 | FLG+/+ | −0.74 | −8.86 to −0.61 | <.001 |
| FLG+/− | −0.24 | −0.36 to −0.11 | <.001 |
A post hoc analysis with Tukey correction shows a statistically significant difference in mean NMF between each pairwise comparison for the 3 FLG genotype subgroups.
∗
Tukey multiple comparisons.