Skip to main content
. 2013 Feb 21;20(3):513–518. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2012-001510

Table 3.

Differences in days/week of self-monitoring, BMI, dietary variables, and Eating Behavior Inventory score by diet self-monitoring methods at 6 months

Dietary monitoring Mobile diet app Paper journal Web site Overall model significance level p Value for type of monitoring method*
n 37 17 24
Mean day/week of diet self-monitoring 3.4±0.8 1.6±0.7 2.1±0.8 F (11,77)=2.83; p=0.63 F (11,77)=2.83; p=0.14
Energy intake, kcal 1437±188† 2049±175 1834±185 F (12,76)=4.71; p<0.001 F (12,76)=3.89; p=0.03
Fat, % kcal 34.6±2.7 35.3±2.5 31.7±2.6 F (12,76)=2.25; p=0.02 F (12,76)=0.72; p=0.49
Added sugar, tsp/day 5.8±2.9 10.2±2.6 9.2±2.8 F (12,76)=2.73; p=0.005 F (12,76)=0.95; p=0.39
Fruit, cups/day 1.4±0.3 1.6±0.3 1.1±0.3 F (12,76)=1.47; p=0.16 F (12,76)=0.77; p=0.47
Vegetables, cups/day 2.2±0.4 2.6±0.3 2.4±0.4 F (12,76)=2.87; p=0.003 F (12,76)=0.41; p=0.67
Eating Behavior Inventory score 90.8±4.7 84.9±4.3 84.4±4.6 F (12,77)=3.22; p=0.001 F (12,77)=0.81; p=0.45
Body mass index, kg/m2 31.0±0.8 32.5±0.7 32.3±0.8 F (12,77)=36.36; p<0.001 F (12,77)=1.64; p=0.20

Data are mean±SE.

*p Value is for differences among the three different diet monitoring types using univariate general linear models for 6-month outcomes. All models were adjusted for the baseline value of the examined 6-month outcome, age, race, gender, education, original randomized group (Podcast vs Podcast+Mobile), and interaction terms for monitoring method and race, and monitoring method and gender.

†Significantly different from the paper journal group (p<0.05).

BMI, body mass index; tsp, teaspoon.