Skip to main content
. 2013 Apr 16;2:e00458. doi: 10.7554/eLife.00458

Table 5.

Summary of a permutational distance-based linear model testing the effect of age (Age), gender (Sex), pet ownership (Dog or Cat), and family size (FamSize) on unweighted and weighted UniFrac distance (measures of community dissimilarity)

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.00458.009

AgeGroup Body site Best model AICc Psuedo-F p r2
Unweighted All Palms (L&R) (+)Age −453.49 5.9182 0.001 2.2
(+)Dog −455.94 4.4837 0.001 1.19
(+)FamSize −454.95 2.0378 0.001 0.62
Forehead (+)Age −264.31 2.7579 0.001 1.69
Fecal (+)Age −269.34 4.3775 0.001 2.71
Oral (+)Age −386.58 2.4774 0.002 1.5
Adults Palms (L&R) (+)Dog −284.03 4.303 0.001 2.43
Forehead (+)Dog −166.1 2.3878 0.001 2.33
Fecal None NA NA NA NA
Oral None NA NA NA NA
Infants Palms (L&R) None NA NA NA NA
Forehead None NA NA NA NA
Fecal None NA NA NA NA
Oral None NA NA NA NA
Seniors Palms (L&R) None NA NA NA NA
Forehead None NA NA NA NA
Fecal None NA NA NA NA
Oral None NA NA NA NA
Weighted All Palms (L&R) (+)Age −727.66 23.597 0.001 9.05
(+)Sex −730.84 5.218 0.001 1.57
(+)FamSize −733.39 4.5795 0.002 0.39
Forehead (+)Age −418.2 19.463 0.001 15.11
(+)Sex −423.78 7.6939 0.001 1.29
(+)FamSize −424.89 3.1675 0.028 0.22
Fecal (+)Age −353.08 2.4044 0.061 1.51
Oral (+)FamSize −416.32 3.4073 0.019 2.05
Adults Palms (L&R) (+)Sex −462.24 4.5058 0.002 5.36
(+)FamSize −464.11 3.9149 0.003 1.09
(+)Dog −465.65 3.5858 0.003 0.22
Forehead (+)Sex −295.94 4.3628 0.008 4.18
Fecal None NA NA NA NA
Oral None NA NA NA NA

This analysis was performed for the entire data set (All) as well as separately for age groups. The terms from the best model for each body site are shown, along with the percent of total variation explained (r2). Those terms of statistically significant and largest effect are bolded for each body site.