Skip to main content
. 2013 Apr 16;2:e00458. doi: 10.7554/eLife.00458

Table 9.

Summary of taxon abundances (%) present on the palms for each age group

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.00458.015

Infants Children/ Adolescents Adults Seniors
Actinobacteria
Corynebacteriaceae 0.7 (0.6) 3 (2.3) 4.2 (3.9) 4.3 (4.0)
Micrococcaceae 4.7 (3.9) 3.9 (3.9) 2.8 (2.6) 2.7 (2.8)
Propionibacteriaceae* (0.00016) 3.1 (2.2) 11 (11) 27 (27) 20 (15.9)
Bacteroidetes
Bacteroidaceae 0.5 (0.6) 1.6 (1.4) 1.6 (3.3) 3.4 (8.7)
Flavobacteriaceae 1 (1.4) 1.9 (1.4) 2.7 (2.0) 3.8 (4.1)
Porphyromonadaceae 2 (2.1) 1.9 (1.5) 1.4 (0.7) 0.6 (1.0)
Prevotellaceae 5.6 (4.2) 4.2 (5.7) 3.1 (3.0) 2.1 (1.7)
Firmicutes
Carnobacteriaceae* (1.15 × 10-11) 6.4 (5.8) 5 (3.5) 1.7 (1.9) 1 (0.7)
ClostridialesFamilyXI.IncertaeSedis 0.2 (NA) 1.5 (NA) 1 (NA) 1.4 (NA)
Lachnospiraceae* (8.57 × 10-5) 0.3 (0.5) 0.9 (1.3) 1 (1.5) 3.1 (7.2)
Lactobacillaceae 0.1 (NA) 0.2 (NA) 1.5 (NA) 4.2 (NA)
(Ruminococcaceae*) (1.17 × 10-5) NA (0.2 ) NA (0.7) NA (0.8) NA (3.5)
Staphylococcaceae 3.2 (2.1) 5.1 (7.2) 6.7 (7.3) 2.8 (2.2)
Streptococcaceae* (3.91 × 10-10) 49 (54) 27 (26) 15 (16) 13 (9.1)
Veillonellaceae* (1.76 × 10-7) 5.5 (4.5) 2.2 (2.1) 1.7 (2.0) 1.9 (2.1)
Fusobacteria
Fusobacteriaceae 1.6 (1.6) 1.8 (1.2) 1.4 (1.2) 1 (1.0)
Betaproteobacteria
Comamonadaceae* (9.90 × 10-5) 0.7 (0.3) 0.7 (1.0) 1.5 (1.7) 3.6 (3.7)
Neisseriaceae 2.6 (2.4) 3.5 (2.3) 1.6 (1.1) 2 (1.6)
Gammaproteobacteria
Moraxellaceae 1.5 (0.7) 1.2 (1.7) 3.2 (2.7) 3.3 (2.7)
Pasteurellaceae* (0.017) 2.6 (3.3) 4.4 (2.9) 1.8 (1.6) 1.2 (1.1)
Pseudomonadaceae* (0.049) 0.2 (0.2) 0.6 (0.7) 1.1 (1.0) 2.4 (3.0)
(Enterobacteriaceae*) (0.027) NA (0.6) NA (0.8) NA (0.8) NA (2.7)
*

A significant effect of age (p<0.05 after Bonferroni correction; exact p-values are shown in parentheses).

Shown only for the right palm (left palm showed similar trends). Infants were considered to be individuals aged 0–12 months, children/adolescents as 1–17 years, adults as 18–59 years and seniors as ≥60 years. Abundances for the left palm are shown in parentheses. Family level abundances of greater than 1% were subjected to ANOVA analysis in QIIME. Taxa present at >1% on the left palm but <1% on the right are shown in parentheses.