Table 1.
Pairwise comparisons of 16 independent studies of melanoma and their associated distribution of common genes.*
| Alonso et al., 2007 (243) | Bogunovic et al., 2009 (209) | Haqq et al., 2005 (19) | Hoek et al., 2004 (589) | Jaeger et al., 2007 (308) | Jeffs et al., 2009 (96) | John et al., 2008 (21) | Kabbarah et al., 2010 (30) | Kashani-sabet et al., 2009 (5) | Koh et al., 2009 (14) | Mandruzzato et al., 2006 (71) | Okamoto et al., 2005 (20) | Riker et al., 2008(65) | Scatolini et al., 2010 (455) | Smith, Hoek & Becker, 2005 (94 of 100) | Winneperninckx et al., 2006 (235) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alonso et al., 2007 (243) | 2 | 1 | 12 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 7 | |
| Bogunovic et al., 2009 (209) | 1 | 9 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 6 | ||
| Haqq et al., 2005 (19) | 7 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||
| Hoek et al., 2004 (589) | 34 | 19 | 0 | 7 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 2 | 8 | 17 | 6 | 4 | ||||
| Jaeger et al., 2007 (308) | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 27 | 84 | 9 | 14 | |||||
| Jeffs et al., 2009 (96) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | ||||||
| John et al., 2008 (21) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |||||||
| Kabbarah et al., 2010 (30) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 | ||||||||
| Kashani-sabet et al., 2009 (5) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |||||||||
| Koh et al., 2009 (14) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | ||||||||||
| Mandruzzato et al., 2006 (71) | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Okamoto et al., 2005 (20) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||
| Riker et al., 2008 (65) | 16 | 7 | 4 | |||||||||||||
| Scatolini et al., 2010 (455) | 4 | 14 | ||||||||||||||
| Smith, Hoek & Becker, 2005 (94 of 100) | 1 | |||||||||||||||
| Winneperninckx et al., 2006 (235) |
Notes.
*
The numbers in brackets are the number of genes in the orginal study signatures. The 4 microarray datasets used in the current study are highlighted with underline.