Table 3. Direction and strength of changes in behaviour after experimental presentation, and whether the observed behavioural change supports the threat sensitivity hypothesis.
Behaviour | High pressure site | Low pressure site | ||||
Hunter | Gatherer | Researcher | Hunter | Gatherer | Researcher | |
Threat level | High | Intermediate | Low | High | Intermediate | Low |
Immediate vocalisations | −2.49±1.03 | −1.66±0.59 | −0.52±1.25 | −1.62±0.11 | 1.91±0.29 | 0.34±0.48 |
Vocalisations | −1.00±0.23 | −0.50±0.05 | 1.70±0.26 | −0.71±0.25 | −0.33±0.31 | −0.90±0.17 |
Travel | −1.15±0.40 | −2.61±0.19 | −0.11±0.09 | −1.14±0.58 | −1.28±0.82 | −0.86±1.35 |
Visibility | −1.68±0.18 | −0.76±0.90 | −0.63±0.28 | −1.68±0.18 | −0.76±0.90 | −0.63±0.28 |
Supports hypothesis | Yes | No |
Vocal responses are displayed on a log scale, and probability of travelling and being visible are on a logit scale so standard errors can be displayed. Significant changes in behaviour are shown in bold.