Table 3. Factors to be modified when adapting operational design of model community health worker (CHW) costing system to local context.
Factor | Assumption for example model | Condition |
||
---|---|---|---|---|
Low | Medium | High | ||
Population density | Low | Rural | Periurban | Urban |
Facility density | Low | Rural | Periurban | Urban |
Task load | Low | General counselling tasks at household or outreach centres | General counselling and case management tasks at household level, with data reporting | General counselling and case management tasks at household and/or health post level, with data reporting and additional specialized tasks |
Education and literacy | Medium–high | None | Primary school | Secondary school |
CHW integration with health systema | High | CHW programme works in isolation from health system; links to health system weak | Health system recognizes CHW programme and provides support or guidelines. | Health system provides comprehensive support to CHW programme, including training, supervision, referral, equipment and supplies. |
Country ownership and financial supporta | High | CHWs not recognized as part of national system; no financial support provided by government | CHWs recognized as part of health system but role not formalized; little or no financial support provided by government | CHWs recognized as part of health system; partial to full financing by government |
a Functionality definition provided by the Community Health Worker Assessment and Improvement Matrix.32