Skip to main content
. 2013 Feb;4(1):15–35. doi: 10.1177/2040620712461047

Table 2.

Description of JAK inhibitor trials.

JAK inhibitors Study ID Phase Patients (n) Dose Splenomegaly improvement Transfusion independency MF-related symptoms improvement JAK2V617F allele burden decrease Hematological SE Nonhematological SE Reduced dose/discontinued therapy
INCB018424 (Ruxolitinib) Verstovsek et al. [2010] I/II 153 (81 PMF, 49 post-PV MF, 23 post-ET MF) 20–100 mg daily 44% (61/140); ≥50% reduction 68.8% [75/109] according to MFSAF score 14.7% (5/34) Anemia (23%, new onset), thrombocytopenia (20%, Gr 3/4) 49% Gr 1–4, 7% Gr 3/4 (the most common: diarrhea (5.9% Gr 1/2) and fatigue (4.3%; 1.3 Gr 3/4) 75% were still taking the therapy at time of writing
Verstovsek et al. [2010] II 73 (34 PV, 39 ET) PV: 10 mg BiD ET: 25 mg BiD PV: 60% (13/21); all ≥50% reduction; 57%: nonpalpable spleen ET: 100% (4/4); all ≥50% reduction phlebotomy independence among PV: 100% (24/24) Marked improvement was noted in pruritus (100%) bone pain, night sweats, weakness and fever PV versus ET: anemia (12% versus 18%, Gr ≥2), thrombocytopenia (6% versus 0%, Gr ≥2), neutropenia (0% versus 6%, Gr ≥2); all were reversible. ET: gastrointestinal disorder (1 patient), and peripheral neuropathy (1 patient)
Verstovsek et al. [2012] [COMFORT-I] III 309 with intermediate-2 to high risk MPN (ruxolitinib: 155; placebo: 154) 15–20 mg BiD Ruxolitinib: 41.9%; placebo: 0.7% (all ≥35% reduction) Ruxolitinib: 45.9%; placebo: 5.3% (all ≥50% improvement) Ruxolitinib versus placebo: grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia (12.9% versus 1.3%), grade 3/4 anemia (45.2% versus 19.2%) Ruxolitinib versus placebo: abdominal pain (10.3% versus 41.1%), fatigue (25.2% versus 33.8%), diarrhea (23.2% versus 21.2%) and peripheral edema (18.7% versus 22.5%) Ruxolitinib versus placebo: 11.0% versus 10.6% due to adverse events
Harrison et al. [2012] [COMFORT-II] III 219 with intermediate-2 to high-risk MPN (ruxolitinib: 146; BAT: 73) 15-20 mg BiD Ruxolitinib: 28%; placebo: 0% (all ≥35% reduction) At week 48, patients receiving ruxolitinib had marked reductions in myelofibrosis-associated symptoms, including appetite loss, dyspnea, fatigue, insomnia, and pain, whereas patients receiving the BAT had worsening symptoms Thrombocytopenia and anemia occurred more frequently in the patients receiving ruxolitinib than in those receiving BAT Ruxolitinib versus BAT: diarrhea (24.0% versus 12.0%), and peripheral edema (22% versus 26.0%) Discontinuation of treatment owing to adverse events (8% in the ruxolitinib group versus 5% in the BAT group)
Verstovsek, NCT01243944 [RESPONSE] III (ongoing) Enrolling PV patients resistant/intolerant to hydroxyurea
CEP701 (Lestaurtinib) Moliterno et al. [2009] I/II 39 ( 27 PV and 12 ET) 80-120 mg BiD 83% (15/18); all had >5 cm reduction in spleen volume 20% (3/15) Thrombotic events (13%) Gastrointestinal (constitutional in nature) 13% discontinued therapy (1: disease progression; 1: leg cramps; 3: GI SE)
Santos et al. [2010] II 22 (15 PMF, 4 post-PV MF, 3 post-ET MF) 80 mg BiD 18%; 13.6% response according to IWG criteria 9.1% None Anemia (14%, all Gr 3/4); thrombocytopenia (23%) Diarrhea (72%; 9% Gr 3/4,); nausea (50%, all Gr 1,2); vomiting (37%, all Gr 1,2)
SB1518 Verstovsek et al. [2009] I 43 (36 MF, 7 AML) 100-600 mg daily 28% (7/25); all had ≥50% reduction, and a clinical improvement according to IWG Thrombocytopenia (4%, all Gr 3/4) Diarrhea (30%; 7% Gr 3), nausea (12%, all Gr 1/2) 37% discontinued therapy (7: disease progression; 4: toxicity; 5: other reasons)
Seymour et al. [2010] I 20 (85% were JAK2 positive) 100-600 mg daily Confirmed clinical improvement (rate not mentioned) Confirmed improvement Diarrhea (89%; 11% Gr 3); nausea and vomiting (39%; 6% Gr 3 nausea; all Gr 1/2 vomiting), abdominal pain (22%), fatigue (22%), dysgeusia and rash (17%; all Grade 1/2) 30% discontinued therapy
Komrokji 2011 II 34 (PMF, post-ET and post-PV MF) 400 mg/day 88% had reduction in palpable splenomegaly; 32% had a ≥35% reduction in splenic volume 1 patient Significant improvement (>2 points) in: abdominal pain, bone pain, early satiety, worst fatigue, inactivity, night sweats and pruritus Increased bilirubin, allergic reaction and intermittent nausea 50% discontinued therapy; 29% required dose reduction for SE
Deeg 2011 II 33 with MF Dose given QD 96.7%; 56.7%: ≥25% reduction; 39%: ≥50% reduction; 23%: 100% reduction 40-65% Diarrhea (81%; 6% Gr 3), nausea (41%; all Gr 1/2), vomiting (22%; all Gr 1/2), and fatigue (9%; all Gr 1/2) 24% reduced the dose; 64% remained on therapy at 6 months
CYT387 Pardanani et al. [2011a] I/II 166 (106 PMF, 24 post-ET MF, 36 post-PV MF) 150 or 300 mg QD or 150 mg BiD 31% improvement according to IWG-MRT criteria 54% Most patients had clinical improvement of constitutional symptoms Thrombocytopenia (17%; Gr 3/4) Dizziness, flushing and hypotension after the first dose (20% of patients) 32(19%) during the core study and 16 (21%) during extension phase
SAR302503 Pardanani et al. [2011b] I/II 59 (44 PMF, 12 post-PV MF, 3 post-ET MF) 680 mg/dl 6 cycles: 39%; 12 cycles: 47% (all ≥ 50% reduction) Improvement in early satiety, night sweats, fatigue, pruritus, and cough. 86% (38% had >20% decrease) Anemia and thrombocytopenia Increased amylase/lipase (DLT), nausea/vomiting, diarrhea, increased transaminases 23% stopped by the sixth cycle
AZD1480 Verstovsek, NCT00910728 I/II (ongoing) Enrolling patients with PMF, post-PV MF, post-ET MF 2.5 mg, 10 mg, 100 mg
XL019 Shah et al. [2008] I/II 30 (17 PMF, 13 post-PV/ET MF) 25–50 mg QD, 25 mg three times per week 100% [12/12] (42% had ≥50% reduction) 90% [10/11] improvements in constitutional symptoms (pruritus/ fatigue) peripheral neuropathy (23%, Gr 1/2; in 7 receiving ≥100 mg daily) 70% discontinued XL019 due to neurotoxicity

AML, acute myelogenous leukemia; BAT, best available therapy; DLT, dose-limiting toxicity; ET, essential thrombocythemia; Gr, grade; MF, myelofibrosis; MPN, myeloproliferative neoplasm; PMF, primary myelofibrosis; PV, polycythemia vera; SE, side effects.