Skip to main content
. 2013 Apr 8;55(1):29. doi: 10.1186/1751-0147-55-29

Table 3.

Physiotherapeutic evaluation methods in rank order and the sensitivity of each method

Ranking order Test Orthopaedic examination Conclusive assessment Stifle radiographs Stifle/hip radiographs PVF IMP
1
8. Evaluation of atrophy
1
1
1
3
6
6
 
 
80.50%
81.60%
82.10%
82.10%
80.00%
87.50%
2
3. Sitting positon
2
2
2
2
2
2
 
 
70.00%
67.60%
68.40%
68.40%
68.40%
56.30%
3.
10. qmSWB
6
6
8
7
2
1
 
 
39.00%
38.50%
40.00%
40.00%
40.00%
50.00%
4
11. Stifle flexion
8
7
4
4
4
8
 
 
43.90%
43.60%
42.50%
42.50%
50.00%
43.80%
5
5. Lying position
3
3
6
6
11
10
 
 
47.50%
51.40%
47.40%
47.40%
47.40%
43.80%
6
4. Thrust from sitting
5
5
5
5
10
9
 
 
65.00%
64.90%
68.40%
68.40%
63.20%
62.50%
7
12. Stifle extension
4
8
3
2
13
14
 
 
63.40%
64.10%
62.50%
62.50%
65.00%
68.80%
8
9. meSWB
9
10
10
10
3
3
 
 
65.80%
65.70%
66.70%
66.70%
64.70%
85.70%
9
6. Thrust from lying
7
4
7
8
9
13
 
 
62.50%
62.20%
60.50%
60.50%
57.90%
62.50%
10
7. Stairs
12
11
13
12
7
5
 
 
41.70%
41.70%
41.70%
41.70%
52.60%
50.00%
11
2. Diagonal movement
11
12
12
13
5
4
 
 
30.20%
27.50%
29.30%
29.30%
15.00%
23.50%
13
14. Tarsus extension
14
14
11
11
7
5
 
 
36.60%
35.90%
35.00%
35.00%
40.00%
37.50%
12
13. Tarsus flexion
10
9
9
9
14
12
 
 
43.90%
43.60%
42.50%
42.50%
50.00%
43.80%
14
1. Visual evaluation of lameness
13
13
14
14
8
7
    50.00% 48.70% 51.30% 51.30% 52.60% 56.30%

Rank order is presented in the left column, and the ranking of compared methods is specified for each test in the top row of each ranked test. Sensitivities are presented as percentages; sensitivities did not affect rank order. Abbreviations: manual evaluation of static weight bearing (meSWB), quantitative measurement of static weight bearing (qmSWB), peak vertical force (PVF), and vertical impulse (IMP). The physiotherapeutic evaluation methods are numbered as in Table 1.