Table 5. Standardized estimates for the dual growth curve analyses between each smoking-specific parenting strategy and adolescent smoking controlled for age, gender, education, maternal and paternal smoking.
Frequency of communication 1 | Quality of communication 2 | House rules 3 | |
Cross-lagged paths | |||
S Smoking → I Parenting | .05(.07) | −.04 (.07) | −.004 (.06) |
S Parenting → I Smoking | −.05 (.07) | .03 (.08) | .06(.10) |
Cross-sectional associations | |||
I Smoking ↔ I Parenting | .08(.05) | −.29(.08)*** | −.02 (.06) |
S Parenting ↔ S Smoking | .18(.09)* | −.48 (.08)*** | .18 (.08)* |
Stability associations | |||
I Parenting ↔ S Parenting | −.75(.05)*** | −.28 (.08)*** | −.30 (.07)*** |
I Smoking ↔ S Smoking | .13 (.11) | .09 (11) | .10 (.10) |
Note I = Intercept, S = Slope.
(χ2 = 95.45 (56), p<.01, CFI/TLI = .96/.94, RMSEA = .04).
(χ2 = 126.98 (56), p<.001, CFI/TLI = .95/.92, RMSEA = .06).
(χ2 = 90.59 (56), p<.01, CFI/TLI = .98/.97, RMSEA = .04);
p<.001,
p<.01,
p<.05.