Skip to main content
. 2013 Apr 18;8(4):e61673. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0061673

Table 5. Standardized estimates for the dual growth curve analyses between each smoking-specific parenting strategy and adolescent smoking controlled for age, gender, education, maternal and paternal smoking.

Frequency of communication 1 Quality of communication 2 House rules 3
Cross-lagged paths
S Smoking → I Parenting .05(.07) −.04 (.07) −.004 (.06)
S Parenting → I Smoking −.05 (.07) .03 (.08) .06(.10)
Cross-sectional associations
I Smoking ↔ I Parenting .08(.05) −.29(.08)*** −.02 (.06)
S Parenting ↔ S Smoking .18(.09)* −.48 (.08)*** .18 (.08)*
Stability associations
I Parenting ↔ S Parenting −.75(.05)*** −.28 (.08)*** −.30 (.07)***
I Smoking ↔ S Smoking .13 (.11) .09 (11) .10 (.10)

Note I = Intercept, S = Slope.

1

2 = 95.45 (56), p<.01, CFI/TLI = .96/.94, RMSEA = .04).

2

2 = 126.98 (56), p<.001, CFI/TLI = .95/.92, RMSEA = .06).

3

2 = 90.59 (56), p<.01, CFI/TLI = .98/.97, RMSEA = .04);

***

p<.001,

**

p<.01,

*

p<.05.