Skip to main content
. 2013 Apr 18;8(4):e62353. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0062353

Table 4. Multivariate regression models of association between HFIAS, IDDS and MOS component scores (n = 899).

(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12)
General health General health General health Physical function-ing Physical function-ing Physical function-ing Role function-ing Role function-ing Role function-ing Social function-ing Social function-ing Social function-ing
HFIAS Severity (1 = severe food insecurity) −4.48* −4.23* −2.90* −2.79* −3.72* −3.49* −4.03** −3.89*
(−2.48) (−2.35) (−2.57) (−2.47) (−2.28) (−2.16) (−2.63) (−2.54)
Individual Dietary Diversity Medium (5–8 good groups/day) 3.65 3.28 1.15 0.90 1.68 1.38 1.40 1.05
(1.72) (1.55) (0.72) (0.56) (0.80) (0.66) (0.62) (0.47)
Individual Dietary Diversity High (9–12 good groups/day) 7.26* 6.57 3.47 3.02 7.29* 6.73* 4.69 4.06
(2.00) (1.82) (1.38) (1.21) (2.20) (2.06) (1.48) (1.29)
R-squared 0.14 0.13 0.14 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.11 0.10 0.11

Robust t-statistics in parenthesis.

***

p<0.001, **p<0.01, *p<0.05.

Note: Models also controlled for age, gender, CD4 count, education, household head/spouse status, married/cohabiting, IDP camp, household size, household expenditures, time to TASO clinic (minutes), distance to government hospital (km), distance to market (km), district, interview year, and interview month.