Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2013 Jun;45(6):1051–1059. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3182811947

Table 1.

Effects of six weeks of low intensity vibration training on food intake, body and fat pad masses, and muscle size characteristics of mice that maintained normal physical activity and those that had restricted physical activity.

Sham-Active Vibrated-Active Sham-Restricted Vibrated-Restricted P-values for Two-Way ANOVA
Main effect of Vibration Main effect of Activity Interaction (Vibration × Activity)
Food intake, week 1 (g/24 hr) 3.1 (0.2) 3.5* (0.1) 3.9* (0.1) 3.6 (0.2) - - 0.034
Food intake, week 6 (g/24 hr) 3.0 (0.1) 3.2 (0.1) 3.6 (0.1) 3.6 (0.1) 0.454 <0.001 0.518
Body mass, week 1 (g) 21.2 (0.3) 21.2 (0.5) 21.6 (0.5) 21.7 (0.4) 0.949 0.377 0.940
Body mass, week 6 (g) 24.2 (0.5) 24.7 (0.7) 22.9 (0.7) 23.5 (0.5) 0.376 0.073 0.924
Epididymal fat pad mass (mg) 430 (18) 407 (22) 439 (44) 371 (22) 0.642 0.117 0.415
Fat pad mass: body mass (%) 1.78 (0.07) 1.66 (0.10) 1.90 (0.15) 1.57 (0.07) 0.037 0.875 0.312
Soleus muscle length (mm) 14.2 (0.2) 14.2 (0.2) 14.1 (0.2) 13.9 (0.2) 0.557 0.303 0.752
Soleus muscle CSA (mm2) 0.85 (0.02) 0.85 (0.02) 0.79 (0.04) 0.84 (0.05) 0.486 0.236 0.502
Tibialis anterior muscle protein content (mg) 5.69 (0.30) 5.81 (0.21) 4.70 (0.62) 5.59 (0.28) 0.185 0.114 0.310

Values are means (SE). CSA, cross-sectional area.

*

Significantly different from Sham-Active