Table 1.
Study | Treatment conditionsa | N, mean age | Results at posttreatment | Follow-up period | Results at follow-up |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
McClusky et al105 | CBT vs TZ | N = 30, mean age = 32 | Self-report: CBT = TZ for improvements in SL and TST | 9 weeks | All participants maintained gains for SL and TST, CBT >TZ for improvements in SL CBT = TZ for TST |
Morin et al41 | CBT vs TM vs PL | N = 78, mean age = 65 | Self-report: CBT, TM > PL for improvements in TWT, SE, WASO PSG: CBT, TM > PL for improvements in WASO |
24 months | Only CBT participants maintained sleep gains for TWT, WASO, SE |
Jacobs et al46 | CBT vs ZP vs PL | N = 63, mean age = 47 | Self-report: CBT > ZP for improvements in SL, SE CBT = ZP for improvements in TST |
12 months | Only CBT had f/u. All CBT gains maintained |
Sivertsen et al45 | CBT vs ZP vs PL | N = 46, mean age = 62 | Self-report: CBT = ZP for improvements in TWT and TST PSG: CBT > ZP, PL for improvements in TWT CBT > PL for SE |
6 months | Self-report: CBT > ZP for improvements in TWT PSG: CBT > ZP for improvements in TWT, SE |
Wu et al106 | CBT vs TM vs PL | N = 71, mean age 38 | Self-report and PSG: TM, CBT > PL for improvements in SL, SE, TST TM > CBT for improvements in SL, SE, TST |
8 months | Self-report and PSG: CBT > TM for improvements in SL, SE, TST |
Notes:
Because the purpose of this table was to show results of a direct comparison of CBT to hypnotics in a randomized study, treatment groups that combined CBT and hypnotic medication were not reported.
Abbreviations: CBT, cognitive behavioral therapy; PL, placebo; PSG, polysomnography; SL, sleep latency; SE, sleep efficiency; TM, temazepam; TST, total sleep time; TWT, total wake time; TZ, triazolam; WASO, wake after sleep onset; ZP, zoplicone.