Skip to main content
. 2013 Apr 19;8(4):e61591. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0061591

Table 2. Comparison of recrudescence and metastasis risk between different FOXF2 mRNA levels and clinicopathological features in breast cancer patients.

Variables Univariate analysis Multivariate analysis
OR 95% CI P-value OR 95% CI P-value
Overall patients within 3-year follow up (n = 305)
Menopausal status Pre. vs. post. 1.203 0.708–2.046 0.495
Tumor size (cm) >2 vs. ≤2 2.020 1.019–4.003 0.044
LN status Pos. vs. Neg. 3.440 1.736–6.818 <0.001 2.750 1.351–5.598 0.005
Clinical stage III vs. I-II 3.484 2.027–5.989 <0.001 2.236 1.234–4.053 0.008
Histological grade III vs. I-II 1.479 0.763–2.868 0.247
FOXF2 mRNA Low vs. High 1.715 1.015–2.897 0.044
Grade II patients in overall follow up time (n = 226)
Menopausal status Pre. vs. post. 1.181 0.730–1.909 0.498
Tumor size (cm) >2 vs. ≤2 2.492 1.301–4.775 0.006 2.127 1.063–4.253 0.033
LN status Pos. vs. Neg. 3.118 1.703–5.711 <0.001 2.798 1.456–5.377 0.002
Clinical stage III vs. I-II 3.172 1.915–5.253 <0.001 2.144 1.239–3.710 0.006
FOXF2 mRNA Low vs. High 1.676 1.038–2.706 0.035
Triple-negative patients in overall follow up time (n = 39)
Menopausal status Pre. vs. post. 1.764 0.567–5.490 0.327
Tumor size (cm) >2 vs. ≤2 5.135 0.663–39.798 0.117
LN status Pos. vs. Neg. 13.723 1.765–106.704 0.012
Clinical stage III vs. I-II 7.390 2.307–23.670 0.001 6.788 2.043–22.554 0.002
Histological grade III vs. I-II 0.280 0.036–2.175 0.224
FOXF2 mRNA Low vs. High 7.409 1.620–33.881 0.010 6.775 1.467–31.287 0.014