Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Curr Microbiol. 2013 Feb 5;66(6):627–633. doi: 10.1007/s00284-013-0316-7

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Effects of high osmotic pressure conditions on biofilm formation. a Immunofluorescence microscopy of S. epidermidis cell Embp expression at 24 h (anti-rEmb25882 antibodies, green) and counterstained with SYTO9 (red) in TSB alone (Top) or TSB plus 1.5 M NaCl (bottom). Chart quantifies anti-Embp staining in TSB with 1.5 M NaCl (black bars) or TSB alone (white bars) at 24- and 48-h biofilm growth. Error bars standard deviations of the mean. *P <0.01, **P <0.00001. b Confocal micrograph of S. epidermidis biofilm formation in TSB with 1.5 M NaCl (left) versus TSB alone (right) with close ups of depicting cell morphology (below). Staining performed with BacLightLive/Dead stain. c Photograph of S. epidermidis biofilm formation at 48 h in TSB supplemented with 1.5 M NaCl (left) versus TSB alone (right)