Table 3.

Measures of Feasibility of the SystemCHANGE -HIV Intervention (n=20)^a

Usefulness	Measure/Question	Result
	Attendance Rate at Sessions	71.4% of sessions attended
	Did you use what was taught?	Yes: 93%
	Was the program useful b	Good: 24% Excellent: 48% Superior: 29%
	Did you think it was worth your time? b	Good: 24% Excellent: 35% Superior: 41%
	Will you use the program in the future? b	Excellent: 6% Superior: 94%
Applicability
	Overall satisfaction rating b	Good: 31% Excellent: 25% Superior: 44%
	Did you apply it to other habits?	Yes: 86% Including smoking cessation and job search
	What is the most important thing you learned?c	“[I really enjoyed] learning how to schedule time and apply myself more to do the things I have to do” “I learned that I can change and do better” “I can improve my health, sleep, and exercise” “Sometimes it’s not always motivation that keeps you from reaching your goals”
Sustainability
	Intervention Cost d	Total: $3731 or $186.56/per participant
	What participant’s would pay for the intervention?	Mean if self-pay: $177 (+/− $222) Mean if insurance pay: $479 (+/− $386)

^a17/20 Participants completed the final evaluation on which the self-report feasibility variables are based;

^bSelf-assessment on a 5-point Likert Scale where 1=Poor, 2= Fair, 3=Good, 4=Excellent, 5=Superior;

^cSelect representative quotes presented;

^dIntervention costs include: Staff time spent contacting each participant X $15/hr; Staff time spent at each group session X $15/hr X 2 staff members; Compensation for participant travel and time /session; Food costs ~$10/session (not included were intervention development and training costs, opportunity costs for participants, staff time for data collection and analysis)