Skip to main content
. 2013 Apr 21;19(15):2362–2367. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i15.2362

Table 2.

Diagnostic value of colonoscopy for colonic diverticula in 65 patients

Number1 Sens, % (95%CI) Spec, % (95%CI) LR (+) (95%CI) LR (-) (95%CI) ROC-AUC (95%CI) P value
All (44/21) 91 (79-98) 90 (67-99) 8.7 (2.3-32) 0.097 (0.038-0.52) 0.90 (0.82-0.99)
Age (yr)
< 70 (18/9) 90 (67-99) 88 (47-100) 7.2 (1.1-45) 0.12 (0.032-0.46) 0.89 (0.74-1)
≥ 70 (26/12) 93 (76-99) 91 (59-100) 10 (1.6-66) 0.082 (0.021-0.31) 0.92 (0.82-1) 0.68
Sex
Female (13/12) 100 (72-100) 86 (57-98) 5.8 (1.8-18) 0.05 (0.0033-0.76) 0.93 (0.83-1)
Male (31/9) 89 (73-97) 100 (48-100) 11 (0.74-150) 0.14 (0.056-0.33) 0.94 (0.89-1) 0.47
Location
Right colon (40/25) 95 (84-99) 96 (79-100) 23 (3.4-156) 0.051 (0.013-0.20) 0.96 (0.90-1)
Left colon (26/39) 66 (49-80) 96 (81-100) 18 (2.6-123) 0.36 (0.23-0.56) 0.81 (0.73-0.90) 0.02
1

With/without diverticulosis. P values were calculated using the receiver operating characteristic curve area under the curve (ROC-AUC) for comparisons in this category. Sens: Sensitivity; Spec: Specificity; LR: Likelihood ratio.