Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Apr 22.
Published in final edited form as: Soc Sci Q. 2010;91(5):1123–1143. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6237.2010.00724.x

Table 3.

Parsimonious Model of OLS and 2SLS regressions of density zoning on economic segregation and neighborhood exposure in 50 U.S. metropolitan areas in 2000 (robust, clustered, standard errors in parentheses).

Independent Variables Neighborhood Gini Poor-Affluent Exposure
Ordinary Least Squares
Permitted Density Zoning −0.048** 0.015**
(0.009) (0.004)
Constant 0.256 −0.080
(0.139) (0.057)
Adjusted R2 0.381 0.824
Two Stage Least Squares
Permitted Density Zoning −0.048** 0.012
(0.013) (0.006)
Constant 0.253 −0.056
(0.160) (0.073)
Adjusted R2 0.381 0.820
Anderson Correlation 32.966 32.966
p-value 0.000 0.000
Hansen J Statistic 0.696 0.358
p-value 0.404 0.550
**

p<.01;

*

p<.05; Year of statehood and metropolitan population density in 1910 are the instruments. Anderson tests null hypothesis that instruments are irrelevant; Hansen tests null that they are uncorrelated with the error term.

OLS & 2SLS Controls: 2000 values: Household Income Gini Coefficient, Poverty Rate, Affluence Rate, Percentage Black or Latino, Number of Jurisdictions