Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Apr 22.
Published in final edited form as: Soc Sci Q. 2010;91(5):1123–1143. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6237.2010.00724.x

Table 5.

Parsimonious Model of OLS and 2SLS regressions of density zoning on changes in economic segregation in 50 MSAs from 1990-2000 (robust, clustered, standard errors in parentheses).

Independent Variables Neighborhood Gini Poor-Affluent Exposure
Ordinary Least Squares
Permitted Density Zoning −0.032** 0.015**
(0.010) (0.004)
Constant .247 ** 0.042
(0.085) (0.054)
Adjusted R2 0.574 0.805
Two Stage Least Squares
Permitted Density Zoning −0.034* 0.013*
(0.014) (0.006)
Constant .256** 0.051
(0.098) (0.056)
Adjusted R2 0.574 0.804
Anderson Correlation 32.715 42.291
p-value 0.000 0.000
Hansen J Statistic 0.010 1.104
p-value 0.919 0.293
**

p<.01;

*

p<.05; Year of statehood and metropolitan population density in 1910 are the instruments. Anderson tests null hypothesis that instruments are irrelevant; Hansen tests null that they are uncorrelated with the error term.

OLS & 2SLS Controls: 1990 values: Economic Segregation Index, Household Income Gini Coefficient, Poverty Rate, Affluence Rate, Percentage Black or Latino, Number of Jurisdictions