Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Apr 15.
Published in final edited form as: Behav Brain Res. 2013 Jan 24;243:247–254. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2013.01.018

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Effects of haloperidol on choice behavior in the rodent gambling task. A) Lesioned rats chose the advantageous holes less frequently than sham-operated rats; this effect was not affected by haloperidol administration. B) All rats chose hole 2 more than all other holes. In addition sham-operated rats chose hole 2 more frequently and chose hole 3 less frequently than lesioned rats. Haloperidol did not affect hole choice. C) Haloperidol did not affect % omissions. D) Haloperidol (0.03 mg/kg) increased the % premature responding. E) There was a tendency for lesioned rats to make more magazine entries than sham-operated rats; this was not affected by haloperidol administration. *P < 0.05 sham-operated vs lesion; #P < 0.05 lesion compared to baseline; ^P < 0.05 both groups compared to baseline; ∞P < 0.05 hole 2 vs all other holes.