Table 2.
Allomerus | Phylum or class | HPAD Station | CNAO Station | HPAO Station | Avg | StErr |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Quality-filtered pyrotags | 5312 | 5661 | 5454 | |||
Genus | ||||||
Actinomycetales1 | Actinobacteria | 0.6 | – | 1.1 | 0.6 | 0.6 |
Actinomycetales1 | Actinobacteria | – | 1.1 | 1.0 | 0.7 | 0.6 |
Microbacterium | Actinobacteria | 0.3 | 8.9 | – | 3.1 | 5.1 |
Actinomycetales1 | Actinobacteria | 0.1 | 1.1 | 0.2 | 0.5 | 0.6 |
Microbacterium | Actinobacteria | 6.3 | 1.2 | 8.0 | 5.2 | 3.5 |
Brevibacterium | Actinobacteria | – | 3.4 | 0.6 | 1.3 | 1.8 |
Actinomycetales1 | Actinobacteria | 0.9 | 2.0 | 1.5 | 1.4 | 0.5 |
Sphingobacterium | Bacteroidetes | 0.3 | 0.1 | 1.2 | 0.5 | 0.6 |
Sphingobacterium | Bacteroidetes | – | – | 2.6 | 0.9 | 1.5 |
Sphingobacterium | Bacteroidetes | 1.6 | 0.4 | 0.6 | 0.9 | 0.7 |
Bacillus | Firmicutes | 0.5 | 0.1 | 1.9 | 0.8 | 1.0 |
Staphylococcus | Firmicutes | <0.1 | 1.1 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 0.6 |
Bosea | α-proteobacteria | 0.8 | 0.1 | 1.8 | 0.9 | 0.8 |
Devosia | α-proteobacteria | – | <0.1 | 1.1 | 0.4 | 0.7 |
Rhizobium | α-proteobacteria | 1.3 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.6 | 0.7 |
Phyllobacteriaceae2 | α-proteobacteria | 1.1 | <0.1 | – | 0.4 | 0.6 |
Bradyrhizobiaceae2 | α-proteobacteria | 0.8 | 0.1 | 1.3 | 0.7 | 0.6 |
Rhizobiales1 | α-proteobacteria | 2.7 | 3.5 | 2.5 | 2.9 | 0.5 |
Ochrobactrum | α-proteobacteria | 2.6 | 10.4 | 1.3 | 4.8 | 4.9 |
Ochrobactrum | α-proteobacteria | 4.6 | 12.4 | 0.2 | 5.8 | 6.2 |
Bosea | α-proteobacteria | 1.7 | 2.4 | 1.3 | 1.8 | 0.6 |
Rhizobium | α-proteobacteria | 0.9 | <0.1 | 1.5 | 0.8 | 0.7 |
Bradyrhizobiaceae2 | α-proteobacteria | 0.7 | 1.6 | 0.3 | 0.9 | 0.6 |
Comamonas | β-proteobacteria | 1.4 | – | – | 0.5 | 0.8 |
Shinella | β-proteobacteria | 0.3 | 0.3 | 1.1 | 0.6 | 0.4 |
Shinella | β-proteobacteria | 1.0 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.4 | 0.5 |
Enterobacteriaceae2 | γ-proteobacteria | 0.8 | 0.3 | 1.6 | 0.9 | 0.7 |
Stenotrophomonas | γ-proteobacteria | <0.1 | 1.0 | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.5 |
Serratia | γ-proteobacteria | 12.5 | 15.6 | 1.4 | 9.8 | 7.5 |
Stenotrophomonas | γ-proteobacteria | 1.9 | 4.4 | 0.9 | 2.4 | 1.8 |
Enterobacteriaceae2 | γ-proteobacteria | 0.1 | 4.6 | <0.1 | 1.6 | 2.6 |
Enterobacteriaceae2 | γ-proteobacteria | 1.1 | 0.5 | 1.6 | 1.1 | 0.5 |
Enterobacteriaceae2 | γ-proteobacteria | <0.1 | 0.5 | 1.1 | 0.5 | 0.5 |
Erwinia | γ-proteobacteria | 38.6 | 5.3 | 43.7 | 29.2 | 20.8 |
Enterobacteriaceae2 | γ-proteobacteria | 1.1 | 1.1 | 1.9 | 1.4 | 0.5 |
Enterobacter | γ-proteobacteria | 0.4 | 3.7 | 0.4 | 1.5 | 1.9 |
Total | 86.9 | 87.5 | 84.8 |
Tetraponera | Kitengela | Ngong Hills | Mpala Road | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Quality-filtered pyrotags | 2709 | 2601 | 3078 | |||
Genus | ||||||
Curtobacterium | Actinobacteria | 1.0 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.5 | 0.4 |
Microbacteriaceae2 | Actinobacteria | 1.6 | 0.8 | 1.8 | 1.4 | 0.5 |
Actinomycetospora | Actinobacteria | <0.1 | 0.1 | 1.4 | 0.5 | 0.8 |
Staphylococcus | Firmicutes | – | 0.5 | 19.8 | 6.7 | 11.3 |
Geobacillus | Firmicutes | 10.2 | 8.2 | 2.8 | 7.1 | 3.8 |
Weissella | Firmicutes | 4.4 | 0.9 | – | 1.8 | 2.3 |
Rhizobiales1 | α-proteobacteria | 1.6 | 0.8 | 0.4 | 0.9 | 0.6 |
Sphingomonadaceae2 | α-proteobacteria | 0.7 | 5.3 | – | 2.0 | 2.9 |
Brevundimonas | α-proteobacteria | 1.3 | 0.1 | 0.4 | 0.6 | 0.6 |
Sphingobium | α-proteobacteria | <0.1 | – | 1.1 | 0.4 | 0.6 |
Serratia | γ-proteobacteria | 1.9 | 3.5 | 3.3 | 2.9 | 0.9 |
Serratia | γ-proteobacteria | 27.6 | 64.8 | 59.6 | 50.7 | 20.2 |
Enterobacteriaceae2 | γ-proteobacteria | 2.7 | – | – | 0.9 | 1.5 |
Enterobacteriaceae2 | γ-proteobacteria | 30.7 | – | <0.1 | 10.2 | 17.7 |
Halomonas | γ-proteobacteria | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 0.7 | 0.4 |
Total | 84.4 | 86.2 | 91.1 |
Only OTUs comprising ≥1% relative pyrotag abundance are shown. Also shown is the average percent abundance (Avg) and standard error (StErr) of taxa. Taxonomy at the level of class is shown for Proteobacteria. OTU, operational taxonomic unit; HPAD, Hirtella-hosted A. decemarticulatus; CNAO, Cordia-hosted A. octoarticulatus; HPAO, Hirtella-hosted A. octoarticulatus.
The 1order or 2family is reported in instances when a genus-level classification could not be made.