Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Nat Commun. 2013;4:1502. doi: 10.1038/ncomms2502

Figure 2. Relationship between DNA replication timing and substitution patterns.

Figure 2

The figure shows the proportions of different types of single nucleotide substitutions in the constant early (purple) and constant late (orange) DNA replication timing zones for completely sequenced genomes of five cancer types and two personal genomes: (A) melanoma of study 125, (B) melanoma of study 226, (C) prostate cancer27, (D) small cell lung cancer28, (E) chronic lymphocytic leukemia29, (F) colorectal cancer30, (G) Watson31 and (H) HuRef genomes32. The proportions were calculated based on the hg18 reference allele so that Prob(A→C: T→G) + Prob(A→G: T→C) + Prob(A→T: T→A) = 100%, and Prob(C→A: G→T) + Prob(C→T: G→A) + Prob(C→G: G→C) = 100% for each of the constant late and constant early categories. Note that A→T: T→A is a signature commonly higher in late replication timing in all cancer types. Using the Chi-squared test and correcting for multiple hypothesis testing by false discovery rate, (B), (C), (G) and (H) are significantly different with adjusted p-values less than 0.01.