Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Mar 20.
Published in final edited form as: Bioconjug Chem. 2013 Feb 14;24(3):473–486. doi: 10.1021/bc300610f

Table 3.

MIC values (µM) of compounds 1b–3b and 1c–3c against S. aureus SG511 in the presence of competing siderophores.a,b,c

Test Organism
Staphylococcus aureus SG511
Entry Compoundd MHII − Fee
1 1b + 1a 16
2 1b + DFO-B 16
3 2b + 2a 32
4 2b + DFO-B 16
5 3b + 3a 32
6 3b + 3a-Fe 64
7 3b + DFO-B 32
8 3b + FO-B 64
9 1c + 1a 32
10 1c + DFO-B 16
11 2c + 2a 64
12 2c + DFO-B 64
13 3c + 3a 1
14 3c + 3a-Fe 1
15 3c + DFO-B 128
16 3c + FO-B >128
a

MIC values were determined using the broth microdilution method using visual end point analysis according to the CLSI guidelines.(40)

b

Each compound was tested in triplicate.

c

Data presented here should be compared to MIC values in Table 1 for compounds 1b–3b and 1c– 3c.

d

Compounds were tested as 1:1 molar mixtures.

e

MHII – Fe: Mueller-Hinton Broth No. 2 + 100 µM 2,2’-bipyridine