Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Apr 23.
Published in final edited form as: Arthritis Rheum. 2010 May;62(5):1494–1503. doi: 10.1002/art.27358

Table 2.

Birth outcomes in the women taking leflunomide and the women in the comparison groups*

Leflunomide group (n = 64) Disease-matched comparison group (n = 108) Healthy comparison group (n = 78)
Liveborn infant 56 (87.5) 95 (88.0) 72 (92.3)
Spontaneous abortion 5 (7.8) 8 (7.4) 3 (3.9)
Stillbirth 0 1 (0.9) 0
Blighted ovum 1 (1.6) 0 0
Elective termination 1 (1.6) 2 (1.9) 0
Lost to followup 1 (1.6) 2 (1.9) 3 (3.8)
Among live births
 Male sex 24 (42.9) 51 (53.7) 37 (51.4)
 Twin gestation 4 (7.1) 2 (2.1) 1 (1.4)
 Delivery by cesarean section§ 27 (48.2) 27 (28.7) 18 (25.0)
 Preeclampsia 6 (10.7) 3 (3.2) 4 (5.6)
 Diabetes any 3 (5.4) 2 (2.1) 4 (5.6)
 Source of information on presence or absence of major malformations among live births
  Dysmorphologic examination 51 (91.1) 90 (94.7) 65 (90.3)
  Child’s physician 2 (3.6) 0 4 (5.6)
  Maternal report 3 (5.3) 5 (5.3) 3 (4.2)
*

Values are the number (%).

There was 1 neonatal death, which was due to necrotizing enterocolitis.

One twin of each twin pair was randomly selected for analysis.

§

P = 0.01 for 3-group comparison, by chi-square test.