Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Gastroenterology. 2013 Jan 25;144(5):903–911.e3. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2013.01.049

Table 2.

Small Bowel and Colon Histology and Immunohistochemistry (available in 28 patients)

Data show mean ± SEM GFD (n=14) GCD (n=14) P: effect of diet
Duodenum
      IEL/100 epithelial cells 28.5±5.0 23.5±6.1 Ns
      CD3 lymphocytes/100 IEL 30.5±5.4 23.9±5.5 Ns
      CD4 lymphocytes#
1 1 4
2 11 10
3 1 0
      CD8 lymphocytes/100 IEL 29.8±5.8 24.8±4.5 Ns
      CD68 lymphocytes#
1 10 9
2 3 5
      CD79 lymphocytes#
1 1 3
2 11 10
3 1 1
      Mast cells #/hpf 21.3±1.8 20.2±1.6 Ns
      ZO-1 IHC 152.3±22.3 165±21.5
      Villus:crypt ratio, % patients
3 38.5 35.7 Ns
4 61.5 64.3 Ns
Colon
      IEL/100 epithelial cells 3.1±0.4 2.6±0.5 Ns
      CD4 lymphocytes#
1 13 9
2 0 5
      CD68 lymphocytes#
1 8 10
2 5 4
      CD79 lymphocytes#
1 9 10
2 3 3
3 1 1
      ZO-1 IHC 115.4±19.8 135.7±18.6
#

CD4, CD68 and CD79a are scored semi-quantitatively (grade 1 to 4) and ZO-1immunohistochemistry was scored semi-quantitatively as described in methods section based on positive cells and intensity of staining. No statistical comparisons were conducted for the descriptive observations of CD4, CD68, CD79 lymphocytes and ZO-1 IHC, in contrast to the quantitative data on IELs, CD3, CD8 and mast cells.

Ns=non-significant