Skip to main content
. 2013 Apr 24;4:104. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2013.00104

Table 2.

Comparison of introgression sites and CNV boundaries among IsoClark/Clark lines using CGH and other approaches.

Chromosome no. Positions of previously identified introgressions* Introgressions identified with CGH Comments
Gm01 None None
Gm02 None None
Gm03 36398914–45743871 36382323–45532330** Estimated introgression: 9.36 Mb
Gm04 44751336–45597626 44736519–45611892 Estimated introgression: 0.88 Mb
Gm05 38251772–39085416 38240630–38973056 Estimated introgression: 0.84 Mb
Gm06 None None
Gm07 None None
Gm08 (top) 2040000–3060000 None Estimated introgression: 1.02 Mb; not found with CGH
Gm08 (bottom) 43883437–46941690 43779981–46965555 Estimated introgression: 3.19 Mb
Gm09 None 12714220–30892739*** Estimated introgression: 18.2 Mb; found only by CGH
Gm10 None None
Gm11 None None
Gm12 None None
Gm13 35524268–35862205 35521785–35876466 Estimated introgression: 0.35 Mb
Gm14 None 17302467–17306627*** Estimated introgression: 0.004 Mb; found only by CGH
Gm15 None None
Gm16 30464934–31885123 30469633–31905827 Estimated introgression: 1.44 Mb
Gm17 None None
Gm18 None None
Gm19 None None
Gm20 None None

*Introgressions identified with RNA-Seq/SFP/GoldenGate on a single sub-line of IsoClark (Severin et al., 2010).

**Positions of the chromosome 3 “Type 1” introgression (see Figure 2).

***Newly identified introgression in this study.