Skip to main content
. 2013 Apr 10;17(2):127–132. doi: 10.4196/kjpp.2013.17.2.127

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Effect of CK and M4 on IGABA in oocytes expressing the ρ1 GABAC receptor. (A) GABA (2 µM) was first applied and then was co- or pre-treated with CK (100 µM). Co-treatment of CK with GABA and pre-treatment of CK before GABA application inhibited IGABA in oocytes expressing ρ1 GABAC receptors. (B) GABA (2 µM) was first applied and then co- or pre-treated with M4 (100 µM). Co-treatment of M4 with GABA and pre-treatment of M4 before GABA application inhibited IGABA in oocytes expressing ρ1 GABAC receptors. The resting membrane potential of oocytes was approximately -35 mV and oocytes were voltage clamped at a holding potential of -80 mV prior to drug application. Traces are representative of 8~12 separate oocytes from 3 different frogs. (C) Summary of percent inhibition by CK and M4 of IGABA calculated from the average of the peak inward current elicited by GABA alone before CK and M4 and the peak inward current elicited by GABA alone after co- and pre-treatment of CK and M4 with GABA. Each point represents the mean±S.E.M. (n=9~12 from 3 different frogs). *p <0.05 as compared to co-treatment of CK and M4, and #p<0.05 as compared to CK.