Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Mar 13.
Published in final edited form as: Vis cogn. 2013 Mar 12;21(1):61–71. doi: 10.1080/13506285.2013.775209

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Mean response times (a) and cueing effects (b) plotted as a function of SOA for arrow cues (left column) and gaze cues (right column), under both short-duration (top row) and long-duration (bottom row) conditions. Line graphs in panel (a) display mean RTs for validly, invalidly, and neutrally cued targets. Bar graphs in panel (b) depict the cueing effect (invalid-minus-valid RTs). The pattern of results corresponds to that predicted by a cue-target conflict explanation rather than by a rapid attentional orienting one (compare Fig. 3b to Fig. 1b/1c).