Skip to main content
. 2013 Jan 11;6(3):661–678. doi: 10.1242/dmm.010066

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

Reducing levels of Rok in RhoGEF2 + RafGOF co-expressing EAD clones suppressed clonal tissue accumulation, differentiation and cell morphology defects, and rescued pupation. Confocal planar sections through the epithelium of day 5 AEL third instar larval EADs. Apical (A,C) and basal (B,D) sections are shown. Mutant tissue was marked by the expression of GFP (green). EADs were stained for Elav (white) and with phalloidin-TRITC for F-actin (white). (A,B) rokRNAi + RhoGEF2 + RafGOF. (C,D) rokRNAi+ RhoGEF2. Expression of rokRNAi in RhoGEF2 + RafGOF clones resulted in reduced accumulation of undifferentiated clonal tissue compared with RhoGEF2 + RafGOF mosaic eye discs (compare arrows, B-Bii and Fig. 2B-Bii) and reduced the high levels of F-actin in the mutant cells (arrowheads in Aiii,Biii compared with Fig. 2Aii,Aiii,Bii,Biii). rokRNAi in RhoGEF2 clones rescued the reduced clone size, F-actin accumulation and morphology defects of RhoGEF2-alone clones (arrowheads in Cii,Ciii,Dii,Diii compared with supplementary material Fig. S1Aii,Aiii,Bii,Biii). Note that the high levels of F-actin observed in Biii are due to the axonal projections that are present in this basal section. (E) Expression of rokRNAi in RhoGEF2 + RafGOF-expressing cells resulted in an increase in pupation compared with RhoGEF2 + RafGOF expression alone. The data was compared by a t-test and error bars represent s.e.m. The significance was P<0.0001. (F) Quantification of F-actin levels in RhoGEF2 + RafGOF + rokRNAi or RhoGEF2 + rokRNAi clones versus wild-type clones. The data was compared by a t-test and error bars represent s.e.m. The significance was P<0.0004 for RhoGEF2 + rokRNAi versus RhoGEF2 and P<0.0001 for RhoGEF2 + RafGOF + Rho1RNAi versus RhoGEF2 + RafGOF.