Skip to main content
. 2013 Apr 24;8(4):e61598. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0061598

Table 3. Logistic regression analyses of cerebrovascular disease.

PROG FT FE2 E2/SHBG T/E2 LH Age MetS C-peptide
model 1
sig 0.05 0.05
exp(B) 1 75.71
95%C.I. 0.99–1.02 1.10–>1000
model 2
sig 0.06 0.09 0.05
exp(B) 1.0 45.16 1.058
95%C.I. 0.99–1.00 0.58–3494 1.01–1.12
model 3
sig 0.05 0.02 0.04 0.58 0.11 0.43 0.022
exp(B) 1 >1000 0.00 166.65 1.07 1.03 4.24
95%C.I. 0.99 –1.00 4.17–>1000 0.00–0.69 0.84–>1000 0.99–1.15 0.97–1.11 1.23–14.67
model 4
sig 0.07 0.41 0.106 0.05 0.03 0.03
exp(B) 1 >1000 0.21 >1000 1.10 4.09
95%C.I. 0.99 –1.00 <0.01–>1000 0.16–1.52 0.95–>1000 1.00–1.28 1.14–14.68

Model 1: all sex hormones were included in the regression equation.

Model 2: all sex hormones and age were included in the regression equation.

Model 3: all sex hormones, age, all metabolic categorical variables and hepatic/renal function were included in the regression equation.

Model 4: all sex hormones, age, all metabolic continuous variables and hepatic/renal function were included in the regression equation.