Skip to main content
. 2013 Apr 24;8(4):e61636. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0061636

Table 2. Results of multivariable regression analyses for STI risk perception for peersa.

HIV risk perception for peers HPV Risk perception for peers Chlamydia risk perception for peers
OR: 95% CI OR: 95% CI OR: 95% CI
Age in years
≥15 (ref) 1.00 1.00 1.00
≤14 1.38: 1.02–1.85* 0.77: 0.58–1.02 0.59: 0.45–0.78*
Gender
Male (ref) 1.00 1.00 1.00
Female 2.07: 1.59–2.68* 1.10: 0.86–1.41 1.13: 0.88–1.44
School education of mother
Low (ref) 1.00 1.00 1.00
Middle 1.38: 0.85–2.26 0.91: 0.58–1.42 0.94: 0.60–1.48
High 0.85: 0.53–1.36 0.69: 0.44–1.08 0.96: 0.61–1.49
Unknown 1.24: 0.76–2.02 0.57: 0.38–0.90 0.88: 0.56–0.98
Migrant background
yes (ref) 1.00 1.00 1.00
no 0.90: 0.66–1.20 0.81: 0.62–1.06 1.03: 0.79–1.35
Ever had sex
no (ref) 1.00 1.00 1.00
yes 1.12: 0.81–1.55* 1.59: 1.17–2.15* 2.01: 1.29–2.70*
School type
up to 10th grade (ref) 1.00 1.00 1.00
Up to 12th/13th grade 1.10: 0.82–1.48 0.89: 0.67–1.18 0.74: 0.57–0.98
a

ordinal regression models, all scores range from 0 to 2, odds ratios indicate effects per one point difference.

*

statistically significant odds ratios.

ref = reference group.