Skip to main content
. 2012 Dec 20;7(5):908–921. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2012.163

Table 2. Comparison of methanotroph genera detected in three samples based on three methods.

  Methanotroph reads Methylocaldum/Methylococcus Methylomonas Methylobacter/Methylosoma/other type 1A Methylosinus Methylocystis
Pond B 07/10/10 16S pyrotag 76 85.4 1.6 8.0 0 0
Pond B 07/10/10 pmoA pyrotag 2523 98.0 0.24 1.6 0.078 0.039
Pond B 07/10/10 microarray   ++ ++ ++ ++ +
Pond A 07/10/10 16S pyrotag 496 94.4 1.9 4.6 0 0
Pond A 07/10/10 pmoA pyrotag 5279 99.8 0.038 0 0.11 0
Pond A 07/10/10 microarray   ++ ++ ++
Pond A 23/11/10 16S pyrotag 488 65.5 23.0 8.4 0 0
Pond A 23/11/10 microarray   ++ ++ ++ +

The ‘Methanotroph reads' column refers to the number of methanotrophs in the total pyrotag sequence data sets (that is, only 16S rRNA gene sequences belonging to methanotroph clusters or only pmoA rather than amoA genes). Numbers under the genera columns refer to percentage of the reads belonging to each genus. For microarray data,+represents a weak positive signal and ++ a strong positive signal (Supplementary Figure S2).