Skip to main content
. 2012 Oct 19;75(5):1255–1264. doi: 10.1111/bcp.12009

Table 1.

Pharmacodynamic parameters and ratio estimates of idrabiotaparinux vs. idraparinux after subcutaneous equimolar dosing in healthy volunteers (n = 24 per treatment group) or patients in the EQUINOX bioequipotency substudy (n = 114 per treatment group)

Parameter* Idrabiotaparinux (3.0 mg***) Idraparinux (2.5 mg***) Ratio (90% CI) ** idrabiotaparinux vs. idraparinux
After single dosing in healthy volunteers
Amax (%) 9.93 ± 1.64 (17) [9.79] 10.1 ± 2.03 (20) [9.95] 0.96 (0.89, 1.04)
AAUC(0,tlast), (% h) 359 ± 69.5 (19) [352] 369 ± 84.4 (23) [359] 0.95 (0.87, 1.04)
After repeated dosing in patients in EQUINOX substudy at month 6
Amax (%) 18.8 ± 8.84 (47) [17.16] 17.6 ± 9.77 (56) [15.52] 1.11 (1.00, 1.22)
AAUC (% h) 1213 ± 670 (55) [1086] 1135 ± 566 (50) [1027] 1.06 (0.96, 1.16)
After repeated dosing in patients in EQUINOX substudy at steady-state
Amax (%) 20.0 ± 10.7 (53) [17.9] 19.2 ± 11.1 (58) [16.8] 1.07 (0.96, 1.19)
AAUC (% h) 1286 ± 800 (62) [1130] 1261 ± 672 (53) [1133] 1.00 (0.90, 1.10)
*

All values are quoted in mean ± SD (%CV) [Geometric mean].

**

Calculated using log transformed values.

***

Equimolar dose of idraparinux and idrabiotaparinux. AAUC, area under the anti-Xa activity vs. time over the dosing interval; AAUC(0,tlast), AAUC from time 0 to the time corresponding to the last concentration above the limit of quantification; Amax, maximal activity; CI, confidence interval; SD, standard deviation.