Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Neuroimage. 2012 Jul 16;63(2):858–873. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.07.012

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Validation of the “small effect” assumption for FWHM estimation. Histograms of the FWHM in voxels estimated in three directions, for 1000 randomly selected SNPs (blue) and the FWHM from the no-SNP model marked in red. The FWHM from the no-SNP model appears to be an excellent surrogate for individual SNP models, rarely differing by more than 0.005 in any direction.