Skip to main content
. 2013 Mar 19;21(6):7488–7504. doi: 10.1364/OE.21.007488

Table 1.

Comparison of peak locations from the actual and reconstructed spatial period profiles of the three VOIs.

Sub-region Actual spatial period of the object (in nm) Reconstructed axial spatial period (in nm)
m 1 240, 319, 345 247, 318, 350
m 2 209, 232 212, 230
m 3 209, 247, 288, 337 214, 252, 288, 339