Skip to main content
. 2012 Mar 30;99(2):363–378. doi: 10.1093/biomet/ass008

Table 3.

Pairwise models: parameter estimators, standard deviations and p-values from the likelihood ratio test statistics for full and conditional likelihood methods for the dementia study

Vascular vs. probable Vascular vs. possible Probable vs. possible
Full Conditional Full Conditional Full Conditional
γ(t) = t
α̂u(sd) 0.09 (0.11) 0.11 (0.15) 0.24 (0.10) 0.25 (0.14) 0.19 (0.09) 0.18 (0.13)
β̂(sd) −0.02 (0.02) −0.02 (0.03) −0.05 (0.02) −0.05 (0.03) −0.04 (0.02) −0.03 (0.02)
p-value 0.32 0.37 0.01 0.06 0.03 0.13
γ(t) = log(t)
α̂u(sd) 0.29 (0.18) 0.34 (0.21) 0.50 (0.20) 0.52 (0.24) 0.26 (0.17) 0.21 (0.20)
β̂(sd) −0.24 (0.14) −0.27 (0.17) −0.39 (0.15) −0.39 (0.17) −0.19 (0.12) −0.15 (0.14)
p-value 0.08 0.09 0.01 0.02 0.13 0.29

Possible, possible Alzheimer’s disease; Probable, probable Alzheimer’s disease; p-value, conditional likelihood ratio test Rc or full likelihood ratio test Rf for assessing the equality of two survival distributions; sd, standard deviation.