Table 3.
Adjusted odds ratios and 95% CI for abdominal obesity according to constitution
| Variables |
Model 1 |
Model 2 |
Model 3 |
|||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR (95% CI) | P value | OR (95% CI) | P value | OR (95% CI) | P value | |
| Male |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| SE Type:TE Type |
1:10.19 (6.5–15.96) |
<0.001 |
1:1.77 (1.01–3.16) |
0.045 |
1:1.79 (1.02–3.15) |
0.044 |
| SY Type:TE Type |
1:3.59 (2.63–4.9) |
<0.001 |
1:1.72 (1.17–2.53) |
0.006 |
1:1.74 (1.18–2.58) |
0.006 |
| Female |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| SE Type:TE Type |
1:7.79 (5.84–10.4) |
<0.001 |
1:1.65 (1.13–2.41) |
0.01 |
1:1.51 (1.03–2.23) |
0.037 |
| SY Type:TE Type | 1:4.99 (3.79–6.56) | <0.001 | 1:1.9 (1.35–2.7) | <0.001 | 1:1.88 (1.32–2.68) | <0.001 |
Results from logistic regression analysis, Model 1- crude. Model 2- adjusted for age and BMI. Model 3- adjusted for age, BMI, hypertension, DM, hypertriglyceridemia, and low HDL cholesterol. TE, Tae-eumin; SE, Soeumin; SY, Soyangin; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.