Skip to main content
. 2013 Jan 16;15(1):e7. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2094

Table 2.

Likert scale responses to survey regarding Physeek utilization.

Question Response, n (%)a

Strongly disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly agree
I have found Physeek useful in revising practical skills for clinical placement 1 (2.6) 0 (0) 0 (0) 18 (46.2) 20 (51.3)
Physeek has increased the efficiency of searching for and locating clinical revision resources 1 (2.6) 0 (0) 0 (0) 10 (25.6) 28 (71.8)
Physeek has increased the time I have spent revising clinical skills 0 (0) 2 (5.1) 12 (30.8) 15 (38.5) 10 (25.6)
Physeek has increased the likelihood that I would seek a resource before its intended delivery 0 (0) 4 (10.5) 5 (13.2) 18 (47.4) 11 (28.9)
Access to resources via Physeek has enhanced my clinical performance 1 (2.6) 0 (0) 6 (15.4) 21 (53.8) 11 (28.2)
I have chosen not to attend a lecture or practical session in the past 12 months due to a knowledge that resources, ie, lecture notes, would be available on Physeekb 20 (51.3) 13 (33.3) 4 (10.3) 2 (5.1) 0 (0)

a Mode response for each question is represented in italics.

b Responses for this question correspond to never, rarely, sometimes, frequently, and always instead of strongly disagree, disagree, neutral, agree, and strongly agree, respectively.