Table 4.
Intervention | Incremental costs (€) | Incremental probabilitya | Incremental costsb (€) | |
Prolonged abstinence c |
|
|
|
|
|
UC |
|
|
|
|
MT vs UC | 255 | .05 | 5100 |
|
MTC vs UC | 806 | –.02 | Dominatedd |
|
MTC vs MT | 551 | –.07 | Dominatede |
QALY (EQ-5D) f |
|
|
|
|
|
UC |
|
|
|
|
MT vs UC | 255 | –.01 | Dominatedg |
|
MTC vs UC | 806 | .02 | 40,300 |
|
MTC vs MT | 551 | .03 | 18,367 |
a Probability of being abstinent/gaining 1 QALY.
b Per abstinent participant or per QALY; calculated according to the formula ICER/ICUR=(Ci–Cc)/(Ei–Ec); additional information available in Multimedia Appendix 1.
c Coded as 1=not abstinent and 2=abstinent.
d ICER=–40.300.
e ICER=–7.871.
f Based on the Dutch algorithm for the EQ-5D scores.
g ICUR=–25.500.