Table 6.
Independent variables | Made it easier to reach people | Contributed to ability to stay in touch | ||||||
|
Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 1 | Model 2 | ||||
|
b | P | b | P | b | P | b | P |
Constant | 1.661 | .002 | 3.240 | .03 | 1.763 | .001 | 2.492 | .09 |
Frequency of going online | 0.467 | <.001 | 0.508 | <.001 | 0.475 | <.001 | 0.516 | <.001 |
Number of family/friends |
|
|
0.021 | .35 |
|
|
0.023 | .31 |
Physical/emotional social limitation |
|
|
0.015 | .91 |
|
|
0.039 | .77 |
Age |
|
|
–0.024 | .18 |
|
|
–0.013 | .45 |
In ICT intervention arm |
|
|
–0.196 | .54 |
|
|
–0.300 | .34 |
In attention control arm |
|
|
–0.370 | .28 |
|
|
–0.214 | .52 |
In assisted living |
|
|
0.288 | .35 |
|
|
0.074 | .81 |
F statistic (df)c | 17.094 (1, 58) |
<.001 | 3.136 (7, 52) |
.01 | 18.737 (1, 58) |
<.001 | 3.175 (7, 52) |
.007 |
Adjusted R 2 | 0.21 |
|
0.20 |
|
0.23 |
|
0.21 |
|
a Unstandardized coefficients presented.
b Model 1 uses the key independent variable only. Model 2 adds control variables.
c Degrees of freedom.