. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Apr 25.

Published in final edited form as: Retina. 2012 Nov-Dec;32(10):2085–2095. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0b013e31825c1c0c

Table 4.

Comparison Between the ILM-Peeled Eyes and Non–ILM-Peeled Eyes

Characteristics Preoperative MH (n)	ILM-Peeled Eyes (N = 18)	Non–ILM-Peeled Eyes (N = 6)	P
Stage II	3	5
Stage III	9	1
Stage IV	2	0
Recurrent hole	4	0
Preoperative MH size (μm), mean ± SD (range)	331.38 ± 127.72 (180–614)	216 ± 90.15 (160–320)	0.12
Preoperative BCVA, mean (range)	20/112 (20/40–20/400)	20/67 (20/40–20/80)	0.22
Postoperative BCVA, Mean (range)	20/38 (20/25–20/70)	20/29 (20/25–20/40)	0.09
tMV (mm³), mean ± SD (range)	2.26 ± (0.17) (2.01–2.51)	2.32 ± 0.12 (2.30–2.49)	0.46
iMV (mm³), mean ± SD (range)	0.68 ± 0.12 (0.48–0.88)	0.74 ± 0.10 (0.63–0.89)	0.31
CFT (μm), mean ± SD (range)	172.61 ± 30.09 (149–239)	180.56 ± 26.87 (155–213)	0.57
IS-OS defect size (μm), mean ± SD (range)	29.63 ± 24.01 (0–75.4)	18.20 ± 14.15 (0–28.6)	0.28

iMV, inner retinal macular volume for central 3 mm area; MH, macular hole; P value, comparing the mean values using unpaired t-test; tMV, tMV for central 3 mm area.