. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Apr 25.

Published in final edited form as: Retina. 2012 Nov-Dec;32(10):2085–2095. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0b013e31825c1c0c

Table 5.

Summary of MP-1 Sensitivity and Correlation With logMAR Visual Acuity and FD-OCT Morphologic Features in Eyes With Surgically Closed Macular Holes With and Without ILM Peeling

	LogMAR BCVA and Mean Total MP-1 Sensitivity (45 Data Points)	tMV and Mean Total MP-1 Sensitivity (45 Data Points)	iMV and Mean Total MP-1 Sensitivity (45 Data Points)	IS-OS Defect Size and Mean Central MP-1 Sensitivity (9 Data Points)
All eyes (N = 18)	r = −0.75; P = 0.0004	r = 0.47; P = 0.05	r = 0.71; P = 0.001	r = −0.42; P = 0.086
ILM peeled eyes (N = 13)	r = −0.71; P = 0.0067	r = 0.46; P = 0.11	r = 0.71; P = 0.0071	r = −0.32; P = 0.29
Non–ILM-peeled eyes (N = 5)^*	r = −0.94	r = 0.22	r = 0.46	r = −0.57

iMV, Inner macular volume for central 3 mm area; P, statistical value; r, correlation coefficient; tMV, tMV for central 3 mm area.

P value for non–ILM-peeled eyes was not calculated because of fewer number of eyes.