Skip to main content
. 2013 Apr 12;15(4):e71. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2222

Table 1.

The mean difference m in the hearing threshold value between the series calculated on the basis of n data points collected on a group of N subjects, its standard deviation σ, Pearson’s correlation coefficient r and linear estimators a, b of Deming’s regression y=ax+b and corresponding confidence intervals CI at P=.05.


f n m σ r (CI) a (CI) b (CI)
Series 1 vs 2, N=51







250Hz 100 −3.70 7.30 .88 (0.82, 0.92) 1.08 (1.06, 1.09) −5.49 (−5.84, −5.13)

500Hz 101 0.52 7.20 .88 (0.83, 0.92) 0.93 (0.92, 0.94) 2.09 (1.83, 2.34)

1kHz 101 −4.59 6.91 .92 (0.88, 0.94) 0.85 (0.84, 0.86) −1.16 (−1.39, −0.92)

2kHz 101 −2.42 7.22 .93 (0.90, 0.95) 0.95 (0.94, 0.96) −1.18 (−1.44, −0.91)

4kHz 100 2.15 7.68 .93 (0.90, 0.95) 0.97 (0.96, 0.98) 2.88 (2.64, 3.12)

8kHz 100 −1.20 8.88 .91 (0.86, 0.94) 0.93 (0.92, 0.93) 0.71 (0.47, 0.95)

Total 603 −1.54 7.88 .90 (0.89, 0.92) 0.96 (0.96, 0.96) −0.52 (−0.57, −0.48)

Mean 99 −1.52 5.42 .94 (0.91, 0.96) 0.94 (0.93, 0.96) −0.23 (−0.46, −0.01)
Series 1 vs 3, N=37







250Hz 71 −5.07 12.03 .69 (0.55, 0.80) 1.23 (1.19, 1.26) −10.42 (−11.14, −9.70)

500Hz 71 −0.35 10.43 .79 (0.68, 0.86) 1.05 (1.03, 1.08) −1.57 (−2.08, −1.05)

1kHz 72 −1.24 9.28 .85 (0.76, 0.90) 1.01 (0.99, 1.03) −1.49 (−1.96, −1.02)

2kHz 72 −1.58 10.46 .88 (0.81, 0.92) 0.90 (0.87, 0.92) 1.04 (0.48, 1.59)

4kHz 72 −1.42 10.77 .87 (0.80, 0.92) 0.98 (0.96, 1.00) −0.83 (−1.33, −0.33)

8kHz 71 1.63 10.05 .88 (0.82, 0.93) 1.05 (1.04, 1.07) 0.31 (−0.11, 0.73)

Total 429 −1.34 10.66 .84 (0.81, 0.86) 1.02 (1.01, 1.02) −1.71 (−1.80, −1.62)

Mean 68 −1.44 7.59 .89 (0.83, 0.93) 1.01 (1.00, 1.03) −1.73 (−2.14, −1.33)