Skip to main content
. 2013 Apr 23;5:171–180. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S41111

Table 3.

Physician-reported office visits and subject-reported views on prescribed FM medications

US France Germany P-value
Number of physician office visits over the past 3 months <0.001a
n 203 70 169
Mean (SD) 4.2 (4.47) 2.9 (1.98) 4.8 (2.92)
Median 3 3 4
Range 1–33 1–12 1–16
Effectiveness of prescribed FM medication, n (%) <0.001b
n 170 55 130
Extremely effective 8 (4.7) 0 2 (1.5)
Very effective 30 (17.6) 2 (3.6) 36 (27.7)
Somewhat effective 79 (46.5) 31 (56.4) 63 (48.5)
A little effective 43 (25.3) 21 (38.2) 27 (20.8)
Not at all effective 10 (5.9) 1 (1.8) 2 (1.5)
Satisfaction with prescribed FM medication, n (%) 0.039b
n 169 55 130
Extremely satisfied 24 (14.2) 0 16 (12.3)
Somewhat satisfied 56 (33.1) 23 (41.8) 50 (38.5)
Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied 30 (17.8) 15 (27.3) 35 (26.9)
Somewhat dissatisfied 44 (26.0) 13 (23.6) 23 (17.7)
Extremely dissatisfied 15 (8.9) 4 (7.3) 6 (4.6)

Notes:

a

Kruskal–Wallis test;

b

Pearson Chi-square test.

Abbreviations: FM, fibromyalgia; SD, standard deviation.